2026 Comparison

Natalia Analytics vs Jusan CallXpress GO — 2026 Comparison

Cloud-managed solution vs on-prem Windows server software. Feature, deployment and cost comparison based on publicly documented information.

Methodology

  • Sources for Jusan: public documentation (jusan.fr, jusan.es), reseller eshop-alliance.com, integrator wiki innovaphone.com, field deployment report (group-carlon.com)
  • Sources for Natalia: public documentation (getnatalia.com)
  • Comparison date: May 24, 2026
  • Scope: publicly documented features of both products as of this date
  • This comparison avoids unsourced claims. Where information is absent from public sources, it is explicitly marked as "Not publicly documented".

Main comparison table

Verifiable fact (public source) Common market practice Not publicly documented
Criterion Natalia Analytics Jusan CallXpress GO
Deployment model Cloud-managed + lightweight VM agent (on your server) On-prem Windows Server (Windows Server 2019 documented in field deployments)
PBX compatibility Alcatel OXE R8-R13 + OXO R10/R10.2 All PBX brands and models (Alcatel, Cisco, Avaya, Asterisk, Innovaphone, etc.) [2]
Analysis mode Conversational AI (natural language queries) Dashboard + scheduled reports (screen, email, export) [3]
Pricing model Monthly subscription, no commitment One-time license purchase or monthly subscription (both available via resellers) [4]
Deployment complexity 15-minute agent installation on existing VM Requires: Windows Server provisioning, SQL database, VLAN config, DNS, QoS — multi-step integrator deployment [1]
Updates Managed by the cloud platform (typical of SaaS architectures) Not publicly documented
Network ports required HTTPS outbound only (443) Not publicly documented
RGPD / GDPR Pseudonymization by design (documented) Not publicly documented
Data export Native CSV / JSON export PDF, XLS, CSV, HTML, TIFF, XPS [2][3]
Support Email + chat (documented) Phone support available per hour via resellers (e.g. eshop-alliance.com) [5]
Sources and notes
  • [1] Field deployment report — Athénaïs Carlon / group-carlon.com (Windows Server 2019, VLAN, DNS, QoS, SQL, multi-step)
  • [2] Innovaphone wiki — Howto: CallXpressGo Call Management (PBX compatibility, export formats: tiff, pdf, excel, CSV, XPS)
  • [3] Actaphone.be — Jusan CallXpress product page (dashboard, scheduled reports, export formats PDF/DOC/XLS/HTML/CSV)
  • [4] Eshop-alliance.com — Jusan brand catalog (59 products listed, dual model: one-time purchase and monthly subscription available for CallXpress GO and Fidelity)
  • [5] Eshop-alliance.com — "Jusan — 1 hour telephone support purchase" (billed per hour)

3 key differentiators

Cloud-managed

Against an on-prem Windows server requiring Windows Server provisioning, SQL database, VLAN config, and integrator involvement.

Conversational AI

Against a dashboard and scheduled reports model where data is accessible only in predefined formats.

No commitment

Monthly subscription. Jusan offers both one-time licenses and monthly subscriptions via resellers.

Use cases where Natalia fits

  • Alcatel OXE or OXO sites wanting call analytics without adding a Windows server to maintain.
  • Teams who want to query their call data in natural language, without BI training.
  • Organizations with documented GDPR requirements looking for a pseudonymization-by-design solution.
  • Multi-site Alcatel deployments (OXE R8-R13, OXO R10/R10.2) wanting centralized management.

Cases where Jusan can fit

  • Fully air-gapped environments with no internet access (on-prem architecture covers this by design).
  • Non-Alcatel PBX environments: Jusan supports all brands (Cisco, Avaya, Asterisk, Innovaphone, etc.), while Natalia is currently limited to Alcatel OXE/OXO.
  • Organizations where an existing on-prem infrastructure and Windows Server expertise are already in place.

Leaving Jusan?

CDR migration, BAU continuity, no service interruption during cutover.

Request a guided migration